Peter Clifton wrote: > You could add it to PCB I guess - we could even teach PCB how to invoke > the compiler and build plugins if we were feeling over-keen! (But > perhaps that is encroaching on being too clever).
Also: What is the benefit in separating some features but still deliver it with the distribution? Either some feature is of general interest and is programmed in a way that fits the pcb code base. Then it should enter head. Or it is not. Then the distribution should not be responsible for it in any way. This looks to me like a case of having a cake and eat it. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
