On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> 1) send email to him and his PMC fellows, referencing this thread, as
> evidence that key signing is nice but optional.


This seems like the most sensible option.

AFAIK, signed keys have never been required to sign releases for Apache.
(I'm the only one with a signed key on CouchDB.) Perhaps the project has
by-laws that require it, in which case, this prospective release manager
may need to wait a little while longer.

-- 
NS

Reply via email to