On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey < > mar...@rectangular.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament < > johndam...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton < > > > > niall.pember...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing > > > > reports > > > > >> list. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm very good point. podlings.xml indicates they shouldn't have, > but > > > > based > > > > > on when they entered the incubator they should have. Even going > back > > > to > > > > > rev 1 of the page, they are missing. > > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2015?action=recall&rev=1 > > > > > > > > > > So does anyone have any recommendations on how to handle it? I'll > > look > > > > at > > > > > the history to see why they were removed. > > > > > > > > Geode's entry in podlings.xml indicated that they were to be monthly > > > > for "May, June, July". Therefore, I removed them this month -- and > > > > specifically sent an email telling them not to report, since the > > > > report reminder had already gone out. > > > > > > > > > > Yep, just got to the same conclusion. It happens. For those > interested, > > > here's the commit that removed them. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml?r1=1692672&r2=1692887&pathrev=1695191 > > > > > > and the May report, which includes them as a new podling but no report > > from > > > them. > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2015 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It turns out that Geode did not report in May, so they only filed > > > > monthly for two months. > > > > > > > > It's too late for this report cycle. Their next scheduled report > will > > > > be in October. > > > > > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the decision to file an out-of-cycle report in September > > > > should be left to Geode's Mentors. > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, though I would urge their mentors to decide that a special > report > > > should be filed in September. > > > > > > > I don't agree. If Geode was a TLP the board would have asked them to > report > > the next month - and we should treat them the same way. They're supposed > to > > know when they should report and thats usually the attitude the board > > expresses to missed reports. Also, the mentors didn't pick up the fact > > they'd only filed two monthly reports - so I think we (IPMC) should > require > > it. This is a good learning experience :) > > > > September is next month, so I'm not sure I understand the conflict here. > Is your concern about leaving it up to the mentors? Considering who the > mentors are, I doubt they will have any concerns with producing a report > for September, considering the circumstances. > Yes, I'm disagreeing with leaving up to the mentors. I think we (IPMC) should ask them to file a report in September. Niall > > > > > > Niall > > > > > > > > > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
