On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:39:10 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 2.1 code that was pushed out for inspection addresses the cache > issue mostly, and modularization as much as possible. Everything > else > falls to the rewrite which is underway- I'd suggest contacting > portage > devs, since what you're after is pretty much what's been designed > to > allow for, without requiring hacks to portage- just would be > plugins. Writing a plugin for portage would be perfect, but I can't wait for 2.1 to be released due to deadlines. Looks like the best shot at this point is a new package using as much as possible the actual python libs created for portage. When I start the project itself (September 1st) I'm gonna start to write and organize all the ideas, but you all have been a great help so far. Ricardo Loureiro -- http://pgp.dei.uc.pt:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6B7C0EC0
pgpC5noQilEE6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
