Really the only time you'll see make.globals appear is when you've downgraded portage as you just have. It is quite alrigth in this case to keep the new or the old make.globals, either one will be quite acceptable. I tend to keep the one from the portage I'm downgrading from in this situation, hwoever if make.globals change may be the very reasonf or needing to downgrade then that is not the best choice.
--Brandon On Sat, 02/22/03 at 21:57:40 -0500, Carl Hudkins wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Saturday 22 February 2003 21:42, el lodger wrote: > > > As you can see most of the changes are minor. FEATURES is > > commented in my make.conf. I just use the system defaults. > > RSYNC_TIMEOUT can be simply commented as well. That leaves only the > > header line to change.Should > > I replace the original make.globals with the new one or just edit > > make.conf and > > forget about the header? > > I'd say just allow it to be replaced with the "new" file, since it's only > going back to what it was before the upgrade to 2.0.47-r2. I make no > changes to make.globals, and have a few minor mods to make.conf. > > -- > // Carl Hudkins :: ICQ 5723399 :: PGP 50238D9E > // > // "I do not take a single newspaper, nor read one a month; > // and I feel myself infinitely the happier for it." > // --Thomas Jefferson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
