On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 14:28, Larry Meadors wrote:
Heheh, that seems like alot of trouble to save some CPU cycles and disk.
I jsut build it and forget it.
:D
...and in this case, mozilla w/ gtk2 looks pretty nice.
Larry
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/08/03 3:12 PM >>>
This is a direct quote from Obz one of the gnome ebuild maintainers:
"the GNOME ebuild as provided by us, is "a wrapper for the
complete GNOME desktop" which is what the GNOME project deems
as their
complete desktop. However, there's no reason that you need to
agree
with them on what makes your desktop complete, the wrappers are
merely for your convenience. If you open up the ebuild (as
pointed out in previous comment) and remove the lines with the
packages you dont want (I always remove out acme, file-roller
etc,
things that I just dont need) and emerge, you should be
fine."
"Just beware that this changes will be overwritten on an rsync,
so you'll need to alter them again if you need to remerge
later."
SO I assume that you can comment mozilla/ephiphany out of the ebuild and
not have them emerged.
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 16:50, Larry Meadors wrote:
> Not gcc 2, gtk2 - add gtk2 to USE in make.conf and build it.
>
> :D
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/08/03 2:38 PM >>>
> I have just got back after 3 months away and got home to find that my
> boxes have finished running an emerge -up world (ha, nope, I started
it
> remotely, it's not been running for 3 months - my machines aren't
_that_
> old).
>
> Anyway, the only problem seems to be with Gnome 2.4 and epiphany -
Gnome
> won't build without it (or at least, I can't find how to disable it)
and
> it requires Mozilla 1.4 built with gcc 2.x.
>
> I don't really want to recompile Mozilla with gcc 2.x (after the pain
of
> getting the 3.x Java plug in working). Is there a work around?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
