Hopefully this alleviates some concerns.

Regards,
Jason

On Thursday 16 October 2003 22:55, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:53:20PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > This is an excerpt of a thread started by a "noob" on -user. Basically it
> > suggests two sets of installation instructions - GRP and non-GRP. Any
> > comments?
>
> Yes. Although users might find it best if documentation is seperated, it is
> difficult to maintain and illogical. We already have problems with outdated
> installation instructions for other architectures because most development
> happens on the x86 documentation.
>
> Seperating for every possible choice a user can make would result in
> numerous installation documents. However, a quick look informs you that GRP
> vs non-GRP only has two (that is 2, 10 in binary) real changes.
>
> I am currently working on a Gentoo Handbook which contains instructions for
> all architectures, all possibilities, all options, all choices. It is far
> from difficult to write up such a handbook (although I am currenly lacking
> some information which I am building up). Because such a handbook gives us
> the possibility to clearly define and explain options, the choices the user
> can make are clearly explained.
>
> The problem we have with the current installation guides is that they are
> built from smaller installation guides and kept on growing, without really
> changing how things are written.
>
> The users think that seperated installation guides are the solution, but it
> isn't -- they just don't know it :)
>
> Wkr,
>       Sven Vermeulen

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to