Chris Graves wrote:
gnome2.4 has been rock solid for me a several weeks now (got it as soon as an ebuild showed up). Have you tried backing off on your CFLAGS (and recompiling)? usually fixes my problems with "unstable" programs.
-chris
William Kenworthy wrote:
gnome 2.4 seems to be having "issues on the two systems I have converted over so far:
evolution is proving unreliable (multiple lockups), attachment attaching is not working right (both systems)
stable, nice galeon 2.11 will not compile with gtk2 because epihany, which is a dependency now requires - reccomend you remove epihany and go with gtk1, see below. Went to galeon 1.3.9 (its in portage) but it seems to be missing a few features as the menus have been reorganised.
mozilla/galeon/epihany will no longer work with any of the internet banking sites I use in Oz - have had to fall back to netscape 4.7 and IE
Unfortunately I have been too busy to follow up as I need a working system at the moment, and wish I had waited a bit longer to upgrade.
BillK
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 19:37, Hall Stevenson wrote:
It's almost a fact that most distros lean towards either Gnome or KDE. I tried KDE a year ago with Debian and was pretty impressed. Then again, this may have been because of Debian's very slow updates to Gnome 2.2. I guess I just wanted something different.
I'm now using KDE 3.1.4 and am disappointed... My preferred desktop still seems to be Enlightenment, in fact. :-) So, I'm considering getting rid of KDE and going back to Gnome.
What do people think ?? I know it's *my* choice, of course. If I decide to switch, how do I do so and get the LATEST gnome stuff available ?? I'm not afraid of running "unstable", which I believe is the "-x86" flagged stuff.
Also, how would I "purge" all KDE stuff ?? I do like Konqueror and KMail. Are static-linked packages available for those ??
Regards Hall
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list