On Monday 20 October 2003 12:14, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote: > On Sunday 19 October 2003 07:23 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: > | That's a strange one. What is the contents of > | /var/lib/iptables/rules-save? Just to confirm that it isn't, try it > | once more. eg: > | 1) /etc/init.d/iptables restart > | 2) iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -s 196.168.0.0/3 -j > | MASQUERADE > | 3) /etc/init.d/iptables save > > I just followed your 3 steps, and then did another > /etc/init.d/iptables restart > > I can't get to the Net from 192.168.0.2 machine.
What does /var/lib/iptables/rules-save say? > | BTW don't you actually want 192.168.0.0? > > I thought that 192.168.0.0/3 takes care of machines .1 .2 .3 Above you had 196 instead of 192 - prolly just a typo. However, now that you mention the /3 bit... /3 means a netmask of 11100000.00000000.00000000.00000000. What you want is /30 for machines .1 .2 & .3 but using /24 is probably safe enough anyway. Jason -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
