-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 27 October 2003 22:23, Joshua Banks wrote:
> I've re-read through the postings. I am still left with the same conclusion > which isn't your fault. Its how I've interpreted your email. I asked a > specific question within a statement and I was left with the conculsion > that TindyDns did have something to do with my setup. It didn't and you > were'nt saying it did. But with the way I interpreted your response, It > sounded as though you were saying that TinyDns did in fact have something > to do with my setup. > > My apologies. It you were female I'd suggest we kiss and make up, but shall we just manly hug and make up? :o) - -- Mike Williams -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/nZ4sInuLMrk7bIwRApm7AKCm+62nQiqWCvl2zE0emffhpudM1gCfW20k dcfV4LkjlnPrK8YSjeX8Iac= =eIMl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
