On Wednesday 26 November 2003 08:36 am, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 November 2003 11:47 pm, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> > Ok, it compiles (if you are keep optimizations at a low level in
> > glibc, gcc, and binutils.) But it still breaks here:
> >
> > Replacing ${EVAL} with
> > Replacing ${LONG_PRODUCTEXTENSION} with
> > Replacing ${PRODUCTEXTENSION} with
> > Replacing ${PRODUCTNAME} with OpenOffice.org
> > Replacing ${PRODUCTVERSION} with 1.1.0
> >
> > time needed: 0:0:36
> >
> > WARNING! Project(s):
> > gtk
> >
> > not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts.
> >
> > >>> Install openoffice-1.1.0-r2
> >
> > into /storage/videos/portage/portage/openoffice-1.1.0-r2/image/
> > category app-office
> > * Installing OpenOffice.org into build root...
> > * Scanning for a open DISPLAY to start Xvfb...
> > * Starting Xvfb on $DISPLAY=0 ...
> > glibc version: 2.3.2
> >
> > Initializing installation program...................
> >
> > !!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0-r2 failed.
> > !!! Function src_install, Line 542, Exitcode 1
> > !!! (no error message)
> >
> >
> > Ideas please?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Norberto
>
> This is probably unrelated but I tried to update OO.bin last night
> but received sandbox errors. OO was the fifth in a string of
> updates so I would guess that the problem is unique to OO.
> I ran the update using sudo. I have now logged on as root and did
> emerge --resume and am waiting to see what happens.
Yup, emerge of openoffice-bin was successful as root after failing
with sudo...... any ideas?
--
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
