Thorsten Kampe wrote: > Do I really have to copy all the linke from > the "boot" and "default" runlevel to the new "xdm"?! This would mean > that everytime I "add" or "del" from "boot" or "default" I would have > to update "xdm", too.
"boot" is always executed no matter which softlevel you choose. But your criticism concerning an additional maintenance for "default" and "xdm" is true. I also dislike it. > The "default" runlevel already includes the "boot" runlevel. Is there > a way to say something like > "softlevel=noxdm, include runlevel boot default"? Did I get you right? You want a softlevel "noxdm" that includes "boot" and "default" and another softlevel includes "boot", "default" and "xdm"? Well the first one is "default". But for the second I have no idea yet. But I am pretty sure there must be an elegant solution, maybe http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/rc-scripts.xml gives a hint. best regards Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
