Yet I think we still have a log4j dependency ;-) Because at one point we 
switched ....
I do not mind switching over to the commons-logging framework as it 
would make
something a lot easier for projects like geoserver .... wonder if a bit 
of regex could do
the trick.
> Hi all,
> thinking about it, I do believe geotools is the only library I know
> of that uses the java logging directly instead of using commons-logging
> (and log4j behind it).
>
> Still today, I do wonder how should I configure the logging subsystem,
> given that the global configuration file is simply ridicolous in my
> opinion (log configuration should be local to the current app, not centralized
> in the jdk).
>
> Can someone point me to a sane way to configure the java logging in an 
> application
> dependent way or discuss why are we using java logging at all?
>   
I think you can hack at the config at runtime Andrea ...
> And I would prefer something better than "because it's shipped in the jre" :-p
>   
I think the reason above was why we moved away from log4j ;-)

Jody


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to