Hello, so I think I have created a set of compile scripts for the Xilinx and the Altera primitives. Should we integrate them into the GHDL installation?
Regards
Patrick
-----------------------------------
Wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft
Technische Universität Dresden
Fakultät Informatik
Institut für Technische Informatik
Lehrstuhl VLSI-Entwurfssysteme, Diagnostik und Architektur
01062 Dresden
Tel.: +49 351 463-38451
Fax: +49 351 463-38324
Raum: APB-1020
E-Mail: patrick.lehm...@tu-dresden.de
WWW: http://vlsi-eda.inf.tu-dresden.de
-----Original Message-----
From: Ghdl-discuss [mailto:ghdl-discuss-boun...@gna.org] On Behalf Of Tristan
Gingold
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 6:28 AM
To: ghdl-discuss@gna.org
Subject: Re: [Ghdl-discuss] Compiling Altera libraries for GHDL
On 13/11/15 19:07, Lehmann, Patrick wrote:
> Hello again,
>
>>> Possible error message improvement: the instance label "i" is used twice in
>>> the code. Once for genAltera and once for genXilinx.
>>> Is it possible to report the full instance path for the unbound object?
>>
>> Doesn't line number help ?
>
> Yes, the line number is a good indicator, but we also have some
> modules with many and especially many times nested generate
> statements. It's just a suggestion if it's easy to access the instance
> path while reporting the line :)
>
> Shall I create and upload a new branch on GitHub, so you could run the script
> by yourself?
According to the line number, the problem is on the xilinx instance, so I
suppose this is ok to you, isn't it ?
Tristan.
_______________________________________________
Ghdl-discuss mailing list
Ghdl-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ghdl-discuss mailing list Ghdl-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/ghdl-discuss
