On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:22:02PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:

> > Subject: [PATCH] commit: drop uses of get_cached_commit_buffer()
> > ---
> >  builtin/rev-list.c | 2 +-
> >  log-tree.c         | 3 ---
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Now if we'd get around to rewrite pretty.c as well, we could make it static,
> giving a stronger reason of not using that function. But it looks a bit
> complicated to me, who is not familiar in that area of the code.
> 
> Thanks for making less use of this suboptimal API,

I'm not sure the API is suboptimal. It's not wrong to ask "do you have a
cached copy of this?". It was just being used poorly here. :)

See the discussion in

  https://public-inbox.org/git/20180221184811.gd4...@sigill.intra.peff.net/

-Peff

Reply via email to