Hrm, I am going to do some new test tonight. I think my test environment may have been bad...
Jeremy Shaw. At Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:37:45 -0800, Mike Gunter wrote: > > > Hmmm. With -O2 on GHC 6.2, I get 0.177s, 0.217s, and 0.348s for your > three Haskell examples and 0.187s (with gcc -O2) for your C example. > The output of -ddump-simpl for the looks perfect for the second > Haskell example. My GHC seems to be doing a bang-up job here. What's > wrong with yours? (For the third example GHC's code could be improved > by additional inlining or hoisting of a constant array outside of the > loop.) > > mike > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
