Simon Marlow writes: > The runtime uses non-blocking I/O and select() internally > in order to support multi-threaded I/O. We don't have any > direct support for timeouts [...]
Thanks for the clarification. I understand that. But what would happen if I _do_ set a timeout on the socket level nonetheless? The timeout would strike in form of a read() or write() call returning -1 with an errno of ETIMEDOUT, so clearly it would be noticed by the RTS. The question is: will the RTS report the failure to me through an asynchronous exception? Because if it does, then that is all the "support" I'll ever need, it saves me from 'forkIO'ing a racer thread for every operation that might time out. Peter _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
