On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Yuras Shumovich <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:54 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuras Shumovich <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Is it intentional change? > > > > Pretty sure it is intentional, because it's necessary for some options. > ld > > options are not in general position independent, and can't be. > > Yes, I understand. But how the new behavior is better then the old one? If it was not clear from what I said that some linker options must come before objects/libraries to have any effect then I am not sure what will clarify it for you. > > ld-options: ./path/to/libsomething.a > > > > You're abusing ld-options. Use extra-libraries for this; if it doesn't > work > > then you have found another bug and should file it as such. > > extra-libraries doesn't work because it links with libsomething.so > instead of libsomething.a > Don't specify it using -l..., specify the .a file just as you were with ld-options. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
