Wrongly, as it turned out. Sorry! The problem remains.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, David Feuer <[email protected]> wrote: > And I've closed it as worksforme. I couldn't reproduce the problem > with 7.11.20150103. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:42 AM, adam vogt <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've added it as https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10009 >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Richard Eisenberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> After quite a bit of thought, I agree that this is a regression and that >>> the original program should be accepted. >>> >>> Make a bug report! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Richard >> _______________________________________________ >> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
