"Marco Bodrato" <bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it> writes: > Currently tune/speed usually use the mean of many calls with the same input. > Maybe for _nextprime we should use a chain? Give the previous result as > the new input.
Makes sense to me. > I know that my proposal is an incompatible change for the interface... but > I'd suggest to extend the range for mpz_nextprime. Can we consider both > positive and negative primes? I think that's a bit unusual. We can compare with the corresponding functions in pari/gp. These differ from gmp by nextprime(p) == p if p is prime. And they don't consider negative numbers to be primes. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
