On 11/29/06, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So yes, both apt-get and aptitude use the "renowned apt package management infrastructure", but that infrastructure doesn't necessarilly provide all the logic required to deal with all dependency issues or package manipulation options.
Ahhhhh. I see. Makes sense. Thanks. I will say that I still find apt-get (the tool, not the religion) to be superior to yum in several respects. While it keeps improving, yum is still dog slow (no pun intended) for many operations. apt-get has more built-in features, and also has more add-ons, wrappers, and such available. It would have been nice if APT was what the RPM world settled on (especially since RPM support already existed for APT). Then at least we'd only have to worry about dpkg, RPM, and APT. >sigh< -- Ben _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
