On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 23:37 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:39:15AM +0000, Charles Goodwin was heard to remark: > > I'm sure they wouldn't be against any help or feedback. > > I've been speaking to the gnomedb folks on and off for many years now. > We don't get much accomplished. > hmm, I remember talking a few times with you, but don't remember what were the disagreements, if any?
> > Also, it is well maintained as part of the gnome-db project. By your > > own admission, qof is no where near as active. Sometimes, especially > > Sorry, I meant to say dui/dwi, not qof. qof is a spin-off of some > of the core gnucash components, mostly because I wanted to use > them in another project. > > http://dwi.sourceforge.net is the object framework I'm planning > on using for the future gnucash core engine. > what are the advantages of this over libgda? > Not to sink into bogus methaphor, but ... libgda is a bicycle > and what I'm trying to build with a qof/dwi/gnucash smashup is > an atom smasher. Its a fundamentally different set of technologies > with different goals and different means. > could you ellaborate more please? cheers _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
