Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +0000
>
> Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that
> someone will change the design so that the interface does the
> enforcement itself; or that if the interface is precise about what it
> allows, someone will want to change it to be more permissive in future?
>
> both interpretations are fine.
Yes, but which one did you mean? It seems to me that they have
opposite implications.
> perlis?
>
> google?
Fair point.
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
