On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 08:25 -0400, Dan McMahill wrote: > Hello, > > I'm sure this is a very basic question about passing "or-able" flags to > a function. In C I might do something like: ...snip...
You can make the flags available to scheme as numbers, and then the Scheme users can use Guile's bitwise operations (logand, longior, logxor, etc. [see Simple Data Types -> Numbers -> Bitwise Operations in the manual]). > but I'm not sure of the best way to define the flags in scheme. Or > maybe this is not "the scheme way". This isn't really the Scheme way, but it works if you want to get bindings done quickly. Ludovic already recommended the more schemey way, but this isn't such a bad thing for an extension to a C program. -- http://unknownlamer.org AIM:unknownlamer IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I use Free Software because I value freedom over features. 443E 4F1A E213 7C54 A306 E328 7601 A1F0 F403 574B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
