[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > According to R5RS, if the two `chbouib' instances print equally, they > should be `equal?'.
I don't think that's meant to be taken literally, I'm pretty sure what it's only trying to say is that `equal?' recurses into containers like lists and vectors. > To me, it looks like having `equal?' behave "as one may expect" (i.e., > as in the Chicken case) would be very valuable and look more consistent > wrt. R5RS --- although, admittedly, relying on it would be Bad. Yep, I think it'd be good to look into the fields of two records of the same type. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
