Hi! i think , though idea is great but expanding the focus too broad may complicate the things, but as this could be requirement in future so i think its better to use a moduler architecure and allow us to embed new modules later on but for now lets concentrate over on JVM only.
On 5/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brett Wuth wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > 1. Compiling other languages into Java bytecodes - Compiler concern. > > > This isn't too hard supposing that there are Java bytecodes that > > > represent all of the proper operations that you wish to support. First > > > off it is impractical to compile a lower level language than Java > > > (something with points) into Java bytecode (yes its theoretically > > > possible so long as there is no direct device access or things that > Java > > > simple CANNOT do) without paying a high performance price. > > > > There's a proof-of-concept C++ to Java byte code compiler in egcs-jvm: > > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/egcs-jvm/ > > http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~cristina/uqbt.html#gcc-jvm > > > > Regards, > > Like I said, it can be done, just you'll pay a high price. > > -- > Andrew C. Oliver > SuperLink Software, Inc. > > Java to Excel using POI > http://www.superlinksoftware.com/services/poi > Commercial support including features added/implemented, bugs fixed. > -- Usman Bashir Certified IBM XML Solution Developer Certified UML Developer Brainbench Certified Internet Perfessional[advance](BCIP) Brainbench Certified Java Perfessional (BCJP) Brainbench Certified .NET Perfessional Brainbench Ceritified C++ Perfessional (BCCP) Software engineer IT24 Faculty Member Operation Badar Lahore
