Am Montag 05 April 2010 17:19:35 schrieb Alex Rozenshteyn: > Anyone? "base" isn't listed among the build-depends of the executable, so the obvious thing is to add base to the build-depends and see what happens then (might also be necessary for some other packages).
I'm not sure whether iterating that strategy will get lambdabot to build or it's too bit-rotted, so prepare to dive into the sources if you really want it to build. > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglove...@gmail.com>wrote: > > $ ghc-pkg check > > > > outputs nothing > > > > $ ghc-pkg list unix > > /var/lib/ghc-6.12.1/package.conf.d > > unix-2.4.0.0 > > /home/alex/.ghc/x86_64-linux-6.12.1/package.conf.d > > > > "unix" appears to be in the build-depends of the "Library", but not in > > the build-depends of "Executable lambdabot" > > Adding "unix" to the second build-depends appears to fix the error > > (but now it complains that base is hidden). > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Ivan Miljenovic < > > > > ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1 April 2010 11:42, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglove...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Main.hs:11:7: > >> > Could not find module `System.Posix.Signals': > >> > It is a member of the hidden package `unix-2.4.0.0'. > >> > Perhaps you need to add `unix' to the build-depends in your > >> > .cabal file. > >> > >> Interesting, because unix _is_ listed in build-depends in the .cabal > >> file for lambdabot. > >> > >> Does "ghc-pkg check" complain about unix? Does "ghc-pkg list unix" > >> say it's there? > >> > >> > I have a feeling this has something to do with the interaction > >> > between > >> > >> cabal > >> > >> > and apt... > >> > >> Highly unlikely unless there's an inconsistency in the packages on > >> your system. > >> > >> -- > >> Ivan Lazar Miljenovic > >> ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com > >> IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com > > > > -- > > Alex R _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
