I have a similar problem, but even with standard filter, when I use it on
the remote client (
http://old.nabble.com/Adding-filter-to-scan-at-remote-client-causes-UnknownScannerException-td27934345.html
).

Haven't solved yet.

Alex Baranau

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Slava Gorelik <slava.gore...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Dave.
> Thank You for your reply, but all .out files (master and region server) are
> empty from any exception.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Dave Latham <lat...@davelink.net> wrote:
>
> > Is there anything informative in the .out file?  I remember one time I
> had
> > an error in a filter's static initializer that caused the class to fail
> to
> > load, and it manifested as an uncaught NoClassDefFoundError (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1913 ) showing up there
> > instead
> > of the .log file.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Slava Gorelik <slava.gore...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > > Sure i restarted both sides.
> > > The log has ony one exception that I specified - Name: -1.
> > > Scanner on .META and .ROOT are works fine (I put break points on call()
> > > method that
> > > actually calls openScanner() and till my scanner it works fine).
> > >
> > > Best Regards.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Slava Gorelik <
> > slava.gore...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi.
> > > > > I added my filters to the HbaseObjectWritable but the problem is
> not
> > > > solved.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > And for sure you restarted both sides of the connection and both
> sides
> > > > are same compiled code?
> > > >
> > > > If so, next up will be seeing whats in the log over on the server.
> > > > Mismatched interfaces are ugly to debug.  The messages that come out
> > > > don't tell much about whats actually wrong.  If you remove your code,
> > > > all works fine?  So its just the addition of your filters that is the
> > > > prob?
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to