At Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:58:38 -0500, Sebastien Maret wrote: > I am rather confused by these differences. The fact that both programs > give the same results make me think that it's not a bug in my program, > but a real performance difference between the two solvers. Maybe the > GSL solvers are not suited to solve such a large systems of stiff > equations? I have tried to use other implicit solvers from the GSL > (except for bsimp, which require the Jacobian), and they all have > similar performance.
Hello, A couple of questions: Are the overall error goals set in the same way? If you increase the gsl error tolerance by a factor of 10 do the solutions deviate significantly? -- Brian Gough (GSL Maintainer) Network Theory Ltd, Publishing the GSL Manual - http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/manual/ _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list Help-gsl@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
