Oh, I'd like to know that, too, please!
--On Friday, December 12, 2008 7:48 AM -0600 "Walters, Katherine S" <katherine-walt...@uiowa.edu> wrote:
This may be another silly question, but how does one test the concentration of formaldehyde in solution? Thanks, Kathy Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of tf Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 2:35 AM To: Tony Henwood; Pat Flannery; histo...@lists.utsouthwestern.ed Subject: [Histonet] (reply) silly questions.---PFA "I looked at the sections and the cell shrinkage (and prominent spaces between cells and connective tissue) indicated that most of the "fixation" seemed to have occured in the processing ethanols. I asked him for some of the fixative he used, tested the formaldehyde concentration and found it to be less than 0.5%!!" Tony: Do you think this is because of inproper preparation of PFA in his lab, or the common problem in all researchers using PFA? I do think most biomedical labs currently are using PFA to prepare the fixatives! So, anyone has the idea on a correction preparation procedure of 4% PFA? I noticed some of you dissolve PFA powder in NaOH-conditioned alkaline water, then add concentrated PB solution. We here dissolve PFA in concentrated PB solution directly (heat & stir for 2-3 hours), then adjust pH to 7.4. We dont have big problem in tissue quaility....except when one want to cut the brain in a cryostat rather sliding microtome. Many times the brain sections from the cryostat have "cheese" like holes/cavities, which almost never appear on sliding microtome-prepared sections. 2008-12-12 tf ·¢¼þÈË£º Tony Henwood ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä£º 2008-12-12 06:18:47 ÊÕ¼þÈË£º Pat Flannery; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu ³ËÍ£º Ö÷Ì⣺ RE: [Histonet] Silly Question? Pat, I agree with you. In a routine diagnostic histopathology laboratory, it makes little difference what you use. Around the world for over 100 years most labs use 10% neutral buffered formalin made from concentrated 38%(or there abouts) formalin (or formaldehyde). Researchers, though, are a different kettle of fish. They will tend to hang on to misinformed, "mystical" methods believing they are being scientific. Funny, you would think that they, as a group, would be the ones pushing the boundaries and critically assessing each step of their research, ensuring that they understand what and why they are doing it. (Disclaimer - not all researchers are like this, thank heavens!!) Using a formaldehyde solution made from polyformaldehyde can cause problems. One researcher used it and wondered why their morphology was sub-optimal and their p53 immunohistochemistry was negative. He assured me that he had fixed small samples of tissue for 6 hours in 4% formaldehyde and then processed them using ethanol, xylene and wax. I looked at the sections and the cell shrinkage (and prominent spaces between cells and connective tissue) indicated that most of the "fixation" seemed to have occured in the processing ethanols. I asked him for some of the fixative he used, tested the formaldehyde concentration and found it to be less than 0.5%!! This also explains the loss of p53 staining. I gave him some of our routine 10% phosphate buffered fomalin, asked him to fix overnight, and try agin. Low and behold problem solved. How's that for a Friday Flamming!!! Regards Tony Henwood JP, MSc, BAppSc, GradDipSysAnalys, CT(ASC) Laboratory Manager & Senior Scientist Tel: 612 9845 3306 Fax: 612 9845 3318 the children's hospital at westmead Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Hainsworth Street, Westmead Locked Bag 4001, Westmead NSW 2145, AUSTRALIA -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Pat Flannery Sent: Friday, 12 December 2008 3:59 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Silly Question? Please humor me on this if it's obvious (to everyone but me): why do we use paraformaldehyde (which is so inconvenient to make up) rather than buffered formalin or just diluted formaldehyde itself? It seems that around here, some folks prefer paraformaldehyde (either 2% or 4%) and others use formalin, while some others stick to diluted formaldehyde (I see all 4 on labels for specimens submitted for histology). Is it mostly a matter of personal preference or where you were trained (i.e. force of habit) or is there a valid reason to use each solution (basically the same chemical once in solution, merely buffered or not)? The only answer I've gotten when I've asked is, "That's what we always use." Thanks. -Pat Flannery (not a "real" histologist - I just play one in the lab) _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet ********************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message and any attachments are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of The Children's Hospital at Westmead This note also confirms that this email message has been virus scanned and although no computer viruses were detected, The Childrens Hospital at Westmead accepts no liability for any consequential damage resulting from email containing computer viruses. ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Merced M Leiker Research Technician II 354 BRB (pkgs) / 140 Farber Hall (letters) School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences State University of New York at Buffalo 3435 Main St, Buffalo, NY 14214 Ph: (716) 829-6033 Fx: (716) 829-2725 "Without my flaws I'm really very boring." - random internet blog commentator _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet