I have used QA feedback/documentation/randomized block and slide audit. Would include occurence, root cause, technical variables, patient impact, correction, training, competency etc. I would think you develop scaling like FMEA maybe for subjective items. The pathologist feedback is always a good source.You can use manual paper or LIS to track, then trend in excel. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message----- From: Knutson Deanne <dknut...@primecare.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:06:48 To: <histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> Subject: [Histonet] Quality Management Monitors In looking through my 2012 plan for QM monitors, I would be interested to hear from any of you on how your department may monitor the microtomy bench or embedding bench for quality? I am not talking productivity, but quality. How can we monitor these benches to help staff improve the quality of their work? I don't want this to be punitive, but a learning experience for all. Thank you in advance for any ideas that you may be able to share! Deanne Knutson Anatomic Pathology Supervisor St. Alexius Medical Center 701-530-6730 dknut...@primecare.org<mailto:dknut...@primecare.org> ________________________________ This email may include confidential and privileged information. If this is not intended for your use, please destroy immediately and contact the sender of the message. _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
