Right, which was what I was explaining. The title of the original message was "ogc required to play??", which is why I made the disclaimer about humor.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 2:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlcoders] ogc required to play?? > > > lol no, its the best anti cheat software ive ever seen. When > you connect it > checks if it can find all these dlls, then if it can it bans > you. But the > good thing is it tells every1 else so you can patronise them > whenever you > see them again :D > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Leon Hartwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 AM > Subject: RE: [hlcoders] ogc required to play?? > > > > Maybe this was humor, but just in case...successful exec's > don't display > > any console message. A file (or cvar) that is associated > with a cheat > > was found and this guy was banned for it, but you can't > tell which one > > based on this shot. The only thing this shot shows are > some files he > > was found "clean" on, not what he was busted for. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dave R. Meyers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 10:51 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [hlcoders] ogc required to play?? > > > > > > > > > A regular on my server sent me this screenie of an attempt to > > > play on a cs > > > server. > > > > > > Dave
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
