Jeff Squyres, le Fri 02 Sep 2011 11:58:05 +0200, a écrit : > JSON: sure, it's an easy format, but we're not really targeting web-ish kinds > of things here, are we? > > YAML: ya, that's also an easy format. > > But the goal here is to do something utterly trivial that has no support > library requirement. Unless someone has specific requirements for these > formats, I'm ok with a totally trivial and > not-necessarily-compatibilte-with-anyone-else's-format format.
If we can easily implement our own parser for json or yaml (or some other standard format), we should simply go for one of them. Samuel
