On Sep 24, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> The funky thing here is that the parent/child links between the first >> socket and its core go across level 2 because nothing matches there. In >> the first socket, you have Socket(depth1)->Core(depth3) while in the >> second socket you have Socket(depth1)->Cache(depth2)->Core(depth3)
Oh crap; this scenario is explicitly listed in the figure on page 21 of the letter PDF. :-\ So... disregard my comments here. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
