On Sep 24, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Sep 24, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >>> The funky thing here is that the parent/child links between the first >>> socket and its core go across level 2 because nothing matches there. In >>> the first socket, you have Socket(depth1)->Core(depth3) while in the >>> second socket you have Socket(depth1)->Cache(depth2)->Core(depth3) > > Oh crap; this scenario is explicitly listed in the figure on page 21 of the > letter PDF. :-\ > > So... disregard my comments here.
You might want to point that section out in hwloc.h as this is somewhat non-intuitive. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > [email protected] > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
