How's this?
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/3853
On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>
>>>> The funky thing here is that the parent/child links between the first
>>>> socket and its core go across level 2 because nothing matches there. In
>>>> the first socket, you have Socket(depth1)->Core(depth3) while in the
>>>> second socket you have Socket(depth1)->Cache(depth2)->Core(depth3)
>>
>> Oh crap; this scenario is explicitly listed in the figure on page 21 of the
>> letter PDF. :-\
>>
>> So... disregard my comments here.
>
> You might want to point that section out in hwloc.h as this is somewhat
> non-intuitive.
>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> [email protected]
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
--
Jeff Squyres
[email protected]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
