Title: Message
I think I found the answer:
 
<quote>
 Finally, zSeries hardware supports only up to two levels of SIE. When z/VM runs in basic mode (no LPARs), the first-level z/VM uses one level of SIE to dispatch its guests, leaving one level of SIE available for a second-level V=R or V=F z/VM to dispatch its guests. Thus VSE-on-VM-on-VM runs well (no performance impact) in basic mode when preferred guest support is used. This can only be done on a system prior to z/VM 5.1.0. However, when z/VM runs in an LPAR, the LPAR hypervisor uses one level of SIE to dispatch z/VM, and z/VM uses the second level of SIE to dispatch its guest. Thus VSE-on-VM-on-VM in an LPAR is a poor performer, because hardware support of SIE runs out after two levels. z/VM has to simulate the third level of SIE.
</quote>
 
From http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/z890.html
 
but this is talking about a z890, not a z800. It appears that a z800 can run in BASIC mode. But notice the sentence in red.
 
 

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance under z/VM 5.1

John:
 
    You have asked the correct question, since I am pretty certain that the SIE is the problem (older VMs had 3, and that was reduced). Any answers to the question: will replacing a single LPAR running z/VM (and 2nd level z/VMs with 3rd level guests) have any advantage?


David Wakser

________________________________

From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 11:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance under z/VM 5.1


David,
 
I hope some others will chime in, but I'm not sure that moving to LPAR will really help. I assume you will run the clients' z/VM systems each in their own LPAR instead of under your current z/VM. Were you aware that LPAR is, in fact, a sort-of VM and was originally based on VM? The reason that I ask this is because your 3r level guests (z/VSE) are likely getting rotten response due to the fact that the SIE (which reduces z/VM overhead significantly) only goes two levels deep (IIRC). When you replace the current "master" z/VM with LPAR, the LPAR hypervisor will still "use up" one of those SIE levels. So I'm fairly sure that simply replacine a "master" z/VM on a z800 in BASIC mode with an LPAR setup will not really help very much.


Question to the audience: Can a z800 run in BASIC mode? Or was that the first machine which did away with BASIC mode? If a z800 does not have BASIC mode, then will replacing a single LPAR running z/VM (and 2nd level z/VMs with 3rd level guests) have any advantage.


 

Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or "Protected Health Information," within the meaning of the regulations under the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, including any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.

Reply via email to