David Kreuter wrote:
Cynic that I am I still think dumb luck played a part here; the linux
admin thinks otherwise. In any case linux on the mainframe under
z/VM continues to astound and delight.
Deleting devices so a guest can't see them seems analogous to me to a
power supply failing on a disk drive controller or a disk array: the
operating system (and applications) ought to have some way to recover
from Bad Things That Happen, so matter how rare such events are supposed
to be.
I'm surprised, though, that deleting devices from one LPAR would muck up
other LPARs. I take it the dynamic I/O support propagates the "delete"
intent all the way back to the hardware and into other LPARs? That seems
rather "aggressive."
David Kreuter
Nick
- Re: a cautionary tale Nick Laflamme
-