Hi Miguel.
 
I have this from the powers that be:
Certified systems, at a bare minimum, are required to fulfill the minimal functionality requirements described in Section 4.5 of RFC 2821, the address-handling requirements described in Section 5 of RFC 2821, and the problem detection and handling requirements described in Section 6 of RFC 2821. 
 
The links for those are:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
 
That's the short version of the description - I have a long version in word doc format that I could send to you off list.
 

Marcy Cortes

“This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation."

 


From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel Delapaz
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:29 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] SMTP on VM


The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> wrote on 10/17/2006 11:13:33 AM:

> Is SMTP that comes with our TCP/IP on 5.2.0 RFC2821 and RFC2822
> compliant?
> Inquiring minds wanna know...
>
>
> Marcy Cortes

I don't belive any work was specifically done to update the server to be RFC 2821 and 2822 compliant; and I imagine that wouldn't happen unless we got a requirement to do that.  In fact, I imagine a requirement that begins: "The SMTP server should support the following aspects of RFCS 2821 and 2822..." (with business impacts etc) would be more likely to be accepted than a requirement that simply says: "The SMTP server should be compliant with RFCs 2821 and 2822".

That being said, are there aspects of those RFCs that you need supported that our current implementation does not support?

Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development

Reply via email to