Or not complex (or easy or ...) 

That should have read "The opposite of trivial ..." - the "non-" did not
belong in the sentence.


Any time the proof is left for the reader, it will be non-trivial. The
professors or authors work all of the trivial ones for you.

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:08 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Litotes?

> Schuh, Richard wrote:
> > The opposite of non-trivial would be complex.
> Really?

No, it would be trivial. 

For completeness sake, the proof is left as an exercise for the reader.
Unfortunately, the margin of this email is too small to contain it. 

-- db

Reply via email to