Hello Rich,
Hmm. Can you find out what the microcode load was suppose to fix
or enhance? It would be nice if the message would pinpoint what the
function was that is now just a subset.
If you find out, post the answers, please.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext. 40441
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 5:03 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: HCPSAS875A
>
> There were no messages at the HMC; however, we have confirmed that
> someone was doing a concurrent microcode load at the time. Funny
thing,
> only one of 3 LPARS, all running the same VP CP, reported the problem.
> The only message at OPERATOR was the HCPSAS875A.
>
> It has been reported to IBM via the hardware channels.
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:50 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: HCPSAS875A
>
> Hello Rich,
>
> Do you have any message at the HMC? And if you just IPLed
> what does the log from OPERATOR have in the way of messages that
> happened before the HCPSA875A message?
>
> What was the last change to SYSTEM CONFIG or the IOCP?
>
> Ed Martin
> Aultman Health Foundation
> 330-588-4723
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ext. 40441
>
