I'm using the directory terms as I have not enabled RACF yet (that is on 
my list for later this week)

Thanks

Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering Services 
(CAPES) 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is service. We?re 
here to make lives better.? 

?Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication.? 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, 
you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing 
its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and 
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. 



From:
"Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
09/26/2007 08:10 AM
Subject:
Re: z/vm security advise requested



It has been a while since I used RACF, but if I remember right those 
directory entries are overridden by RACF anyways. But if it makes an 
auditor happy and the CIO sleep better .... well you get the picture.
-----Original Message----- 
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Ponte, Doug 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:54 AM 
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
Subject: Re: z/vm security advise requested 

Agreed. Although, why is OPERATOR proposed as an exception? 
  

The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It 
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named 
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or 
disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us 
immediately and then destroy it.

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Huegel, Thomas 
Sent: Wed 26-Sep-07 10:35 
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
Subject: Re: z/vm security advise requested 

I think once you have RACF installed all of the other sevurity problems 
you describe are solved. 
        -----Original Message----- 
        From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck 
        Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:30 AM 
        To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 
        Subject: z/vm security advise requested 
 
 
        To keep our auditors happy (assuming that is possible) to secure 
our z/vm (5.3) environment I am planning on doing the following. Note that 
our environment is purely in support of linux virtualized servers and the 
only cms users are the handful of sysprogs supporting z/vm. 
 
        1.      installing both racf/vm and dirmaint 
        2.      all linux virtual server guests will be defined with 
LBYONLY and a LOGONBY for the sysprogs 
        3.      all system machines with the exception of Operator will 
also be defined with LBYONLY and LOGONBY for the sysprogs

        Does anyone see any issues/exposures with this approach. 
 
        Thanks 
 
        
________________________________ 
        Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
        Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
        KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering 
Services (CAPES) 
        925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
        AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
        Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is 
service. We're here to make lives better." 
 
        "Never attribute to malice what can be caused by 
miscommunication." 
 
        NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or 
disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this 
e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. 
Thank you. 

________________________________ 
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed 13021 VSE-List messages and set 
aside 12385 VM-List for me 
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  www.ellaforspam.com <
http://www.ellaforspam.com/> 

__________________________________________________________________ 
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside 
VM-List for me 
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com 

Reply via email to