> > Understand that if we were to go this way, the Old School "let the > > customer decide" wouldn't be there. So I would ask that those who would > > object to such a change to speak up.
No problem here. If you ship a more secure system as a default, then there's less for me to do. Also, doesn't really break the "let the customer decide" model; we just start from a better set of defaults. Again, should I write it up as a formal requirement, to make it official? -- db
