On Wednesday, 03/12/2008 at 01:09 EDT, barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MONWRITE was not even very well accepted 20 years ago when it became available > because of the volume of data and "mis-collection" of data. Eh? MONWRITE is a tool for collecting raw monitor data. It was not, perhaps, accepted 20 years ago as a good way to MANAGE your raw performance data. That hasn't changed. What is there to "mis-collect" in a tool that is supposed to write to disk every monitor record the system generates? Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
