What does this have to do with ESM? Regards, Richard Schuh
> -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:21 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Logoff vs. Force > > On Wednesday, 03/26/2008 at 12:05 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > At my previous place of employment, I implemented a class S SEND > > command > on, > > initially, an HPO4 system. It was a problem at first > because SEND was > OCO. I > > had to trace successful and unsuccessful SENDs on a 2nd > level system > > to > see > > where each went. Then I had to find a patch area where I > could put my > code. > > Fortunately, IBM provided a universal patch area called the > Copyright. > > I > was > > glad to see the class C SEND come on the scene. > > Hmmm.... calling the ESM at the *end* of any command for > status logging...hmmm..... (One can't wait until end of > command to call the ESM because you would then have no record > of who issued "FORCE MYESM" or carefully crafted "STORE HOST" > or "SHUTDOWN". > > Not that I'm paranoid, but that's what they pay me for. > > Alan Altmark > z/VM Development > IBM Endicott >
