Perhaps by measuring the amount of tape left on the spindle? A light,
possibly laser, shining on a tangent to the spindle at a specified
height could be detected only when the tape remaining is not thick
enough to block the light. This would remove any dependence on stickers
which are supposed to be x feet or x inches from the physical end of the
tape. There are other possibilities. For example, compare the speed in
RPM of the two spindles. When the take-up spindle is over half full, it
moves at a slower RPM than the other in order to keep the same linear
rate for the tape. This could be used to determine the EOT. 

I would hope that the use of stickers to denote EOT would have gone out
way back in my career. We used stickers in pre-S/360 days and they were
fraught with problems then. Have you ever had to clean the heads and
capstans of a tape drive that had become fouled with a sticker that did
not stay stuck?


Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTS)
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:36 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit
> 
> Now that is interesting.  How does that OS/390 utility know 
> where the EOT reflector is located unless it spins the entire 
> tape first?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:48 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit
> 
> 
> Curiousity question, because I don't know VM:Backup, is there 
> a way to tell VM:Backup to only use n% of a tape? Our z/OS 
> backup utility can be told to do this. If this is possible, 
> then you could fill a tape up to, say, 80% and be fairly 
> confident that the second tape would be long enough to hold that data.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, 
> confidential or proprietary, and if you are not an intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender, do not use or share it 
> and delete it. Unless specifically indicated, this message is 
> not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment 
> products or other financial product or service, an official 
> confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of 
> Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable law, Merrill Lynch may 
> monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling 
> through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each 
> sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be 
> archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the 
> country in which you are located. This message cannot be 
> guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This message is 
> subject to terms available at the following link: 
> http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with 
> Merrill Lynch you consent to the foregoing.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 

Reply via email to