On: Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:43:21AM -0400,Howard Rifkind Wrote:
} Now is it save to swap the 1193 to 193 although several user have access to
the 193. In the directory I'm going to comment out the original 193 and give
the 1193 mini the 193 address. (your comments please)
Don't just delete the old 193, make it 2193 and leave it in the
directory. That way the space is flagged as "in use" and won't be
reallocated accidentally. And you can always do a:
CP LINK MAINT 2913 2193 RR
CP Q LINKS 2193
CP DET 2193
in an exec to see who still has the old disk.
At some point you are going to have a partial outage to do the final
cleanup. When only the never logged off SVMs are left, you will have to
restart them at some point.
You could try doing something like:
CP SEND CP svm DETACH 190
CP SEND CP svm LINK * 190 190 RR
for each svm for each disk, but since CMS in the svm will detect that
the disk is detached and release it you would also have to send it a CMS
command to reaccess it.
Not really recommended as too much potential for disruption. Just a
thought.
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
