Z/VOS is a CMS application. The glass-side user will only see Windows via
RDC and know nothing of or about CMS or VM.

Gary

On 7/22/08 8:30 PM, "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Good luck, Gary. I do hope your organization can pull this
> off. VM-ers need more employment possibilities....:-)
> 
> I gather from some of your previous posts to this list that
> your Windows support software, z/VOS, is in fact a
> sophisticated CMS-based application, that is a user would
> log onto a CMS user id to start his Windows system....is my
> understanding correct?
> 
> Thanks and have a good one.
> 
> DJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary M. Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Nice idea in blog:  Should we toss x86
> architecture
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:02:33 -0500
> 
>> This was our post to the zd net blog.
>> 
>> 
>> "Maybe we already have.
>> 
>> In Q1 2009 Mantissa will deliver a system that permits
>> unaltered Windows operating systems to run under z/VM.
>> Using a desktop appliance running RDC, users will be able
>> to connect to their virtual Windows images running in the
>> VM environment. Goodbye desktop hardware, remote
>> maintenance, high power consumption, machine order lead
>> time.
>> 
>> z/VOS began with the observation that most Windows
>> workstations do practically nothing 95% of the time and we
>> were so intrigued with the idea of being able to actually
>> run an intel-based operating system under IBM VM that we
>> never looked back. VM provided a natural platform for
>> development of this product.
>> 
>> The product has been a bear for the development group but
>> the thought of being able to run 3000 copies of Windows on
>> one System z so fascinated the team that we needed very
>> little additional incentive.
>> 
>> Let's hope IBM can ramp up System z production."
>> 
>> 
>> Why wait until 2016?
>> --.  .-  .-.  -.--
>> 
>> Gary Dennis
>> Mantissa Corporation
>> 
>> On 7/22/08 11:14 AM, "Bob Heerdink"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/perlow/?p=9183
>>> 
>>> "Should we toss x86 architecture and wipe the slate with
>>> something greene r
>>> and more scalable?"
>>> 
>>> "Windows Server 2016 128-bit edition running virtualized
>>> on z/VM in a gre en
>>> datacenter, accessed via my house from a thin client
>>> over high-speed fibe r
>>> optic connection. I can see it now."
>>> 
>>> Hope this happens sooner than predicted,
>>> Bob
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to