I think you're asking the wrong question. The right question is probably
"why was it CPOWNed on the prior releases?" If there's no good reason, then
it didn't have to be in the CPOWNED list in the prior releases and doesn't
have to be in 5.4. (With enough research, you may discover that the volume
once contained a System area -- page, spool, T-disk, whatever -- at some
time in the past.)
Marty
____________________
Martin Zimelis
Principal
maz/Consultancy
_____
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 5:56 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Question about a user volume
I have a 3390-3 volume that is used to store users 191 minidisks.
In the previous three (3) z/VM systems (4.3, 5.2 and 5.3), this volume has
been CP-OWNED.
Is there a reason to continue the practice for z/VM 5.4 ?
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
**********************************************************************
