On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Alan Altmark wrote: > On Wednesday, 01/14/2009 at 11:30 EST, "Lionel B. Dyck" > <lionel.b.d...@kp.org> wrote: > > > The 14.x.x.x network sounds promising - can anyone confirm that it is > really > > available for private usage? > > No, it is not. IANA.org shows that it is UNALLOCATED, meaning that they > could allocate it. (Unlikely, and likely only as a last resort, but > possible.) > > Alan Altmark > z/VM Development > IBM Endicott >
I'm a bit ignorant about z/VM TCPIP. But could an IPV6 address be used instead of an IPV4 for the hipersockets? That would be FEC0::/10 subnet from what I'm reading. (as best as I can tell) -- Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from? A: Ein Stein. Maranatha! John McKown
